Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz, while Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz is around 11% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 10% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2850 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 130W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 351 | 2499 | |
CPU Value | 2.8 | 85.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1258(0.0%) | 1138(-9.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2404(0.0%) | 2142(-10.9%) |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz | 2,404 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz | 2,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz | 2.8 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz | 85.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz | 1,258 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz | 1,138 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 130W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |