Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Phenom II X4 925 is newer than Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz is around 15% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 612 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | ×AMD Phenom II X4 925 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | AM3 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 6MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 9 | 603 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 109.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1352(0.0%) | 1150(-14.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2348(0.0%) | 2278(-3.0%) |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | 2,348 | |
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | 2,278 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | NA | |
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | 109.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | 1,352 | |
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | 1,150 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |