Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz is newer than AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz is around 25% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 237 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core | ×Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM3+ | LGA1150 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (in 4 physical modules) | 2 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 320KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 3MB | |
TDP | 125W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $6.39 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2013 | Q4 2014 | |
# of Samples | 52 | 185 | |
CPU Value | 52.0 | 51.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1313(-25.0%) | 1752(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3119(0.0%) | 3116(-0.1%) |
AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core | 3,119 | |
Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 3,116 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core | 52.0 | |
Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 51.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core | 1,313 | |
Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 1,752 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core | Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |