Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7302P is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, AMD EPYC 7302P uses around 14% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 344 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7302P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$19.99 - BUY
![]() |
$799 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 135W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2014 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 307 | 37 | |
CPU Value | 807.6 | 40.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1925(0.0%) | 1893(-1.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 16145(-50.6%) | 32690(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz | 16,145 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 32,690 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz | 807.6 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 40.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz | 1,925 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 1,893 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz | AMD EPYC 7302P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |