Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz uses around 17% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 256 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$449.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 25MB | |
TDP | 160W | 135W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $29.20 | $24.64 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q3 2016 | |
# of Samples | 67 | 189 | |
CPU Value | 24.8 | 30.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2053(-5.8%) | 2181(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 17858(0.0%) | 13796(-22.7%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 17,858 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 13,796 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 24.8 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 30.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 2,053 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 2,181 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 160W | 135W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |