Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz also around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1056 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$122.28 - BUY
![]() |
$150 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | LGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 140W | 69W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $12.59 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q3 2012 | |
# of Samples | 376 | 680 | |
CPU Value | 60.5 | 42.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2237(0.0%) | 2035(-9.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 7396(0.0%) | 6366(-13.9%) |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 7,396 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | 6,366 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 60.5 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | 42.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 2,237 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | 2,035 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 69W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |