Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz, while Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz is around 10% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 502 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$122.28 - BUY
![]() |
$444.04 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1151 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 140W | 80W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $14.60 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q4 2015 | |
# of Samples | 376 | 126 | |
CPU Value | 60.5 | 18.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2237(-1.6%) | 2274(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 7396(-10.2%) | 8233(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 7,396 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz | 8,233 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 60.5 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz | 18.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | 2,237 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz | 2,274 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 @ 3.50GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 @ 3.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 80W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |