Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz also around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 85 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 5.0MB, L3: 50MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 135W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 70 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 24.9 | 24.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2079(-17.1%) | 2507(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 22600(-45.3%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 22,600 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 24.9 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 24.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 2,079 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |