Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz is newer than Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz, while Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz is around 15% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 11% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 45 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1356 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 35W | 15W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $2.74 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics 510 | Intel HD Graphics 610 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2017 | Q4 2017 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 44 | |
CPU Value | 19.0 | 16.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1499(0.0%) | 1339(-10.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2034(0.0%) | 1732(-14.8%) |
Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz | 2,034 | |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,732 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz | 19.0 | |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 16.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz | 1,499 | |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,339 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3900E @ 2.40GHz | Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 15W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |