Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz also around 44% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 37% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 21 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$799 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.2 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 165W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 29.2 | 24.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2309(-7.9%) | 2507(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 23296(-43.6%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz | 23,296 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz | 29.2 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 24.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz | 2,309 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 3.20GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |