Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz is newer than AMD A6-9200, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, AMD A6-9200 is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD A6-9200 uses around 50% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 52 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD A6-9200 | ×Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | BGA | FCBGA1515 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.8 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 10W | 6W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.83 | $1.10 | |
Other | RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G | Intel HD Graphics 615 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q2 2018 | |
# of Samples | 42 | 10 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 11.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 997(0.0%) | 906(-9.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1149(-4.9%) | 1209(0.0%) |
AMD A6-9200 | 1,149 | |
Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 1,209 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9200 | NA | |
Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 11.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9200 | 997 | |
Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 906 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9200 | Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 10W | 6W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |