Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7371 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz also around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7371 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.4 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 26 (Threads: 52) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2019 | Q1 2019 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 10 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 50.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1455(-38.4%) | 2363(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 25396(-17.5%) | 30782(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz | 25,396 | |
AMD EPYC 7371 | 30,782 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7371 | 50.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz | 1,455 | |
AMD EPYC 7371 | 2,363 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M @ 2.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7371 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |