Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7301 and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 39% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7301 | ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1490 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.7 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 64MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
TDP | 155W | 165W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $28.29 | $30.11 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 4 | |
CPU Value | 10.1 | 18.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1363(-39.1%) | 2239(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14991(-50.6%) | 30347(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 14,991 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 30,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 10.1 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 18.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 1,363 | |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 2,239 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 155W | 165W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |