Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz, while Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz is around 20% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 947 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz | ×Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$518.7 - BUY
![]() |
$548.04 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1151-2 | FCLGA2066 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.0 GHz | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 10.0MB, L3: 17MB | |
TDP | 65W | 165W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $30.11 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q4 2018 | |
# of Samples | 731 | 216 | |
CPU Value | 31.6 | 37.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2817(0.0%) | 2459(-12.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 16380(-19.7%) | 20397(0.0%) |
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz | 16,380 | |
Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz | 20,397 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz | 31.6 | |
Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz | 37.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz | 2,817 | |
Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz | 2,459 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz | Intel Core i9-9820X @ 3.30GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 165W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |