Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is newer than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X also around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 371 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | ×AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$225.1 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM4 | sTR4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.3 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 64MB | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 65W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q4 2018 | |
# of Samples | 64 | 307 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 112.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2641(0.0%) | 2491(-5.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 31289(0.0%) | 25233(-19.4%) |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 31,289 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | 25,233 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | NA | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | 112.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 2,641 | |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | 2,491 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |