Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 3251 is newer than Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz also around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 3251 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 47 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 3251 | ×Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$318.88 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP4r2 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.1 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 11MB | |
TDP | 50W | 85W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $9.13 | $15.51 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2019 | Q3 2019 | |
# of Samples | 16 | 31 | |
CPU Value | 44.2 | 35.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1881(0.0%) | 1770(-5.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13912(0.0%) | 11211(-19.4%) |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 13,912 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz | 11,211 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 44.2 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz | 35.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 1,881 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz | 1,770 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | Intel Xeon Silver 4208 @ 2.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 50W | 85W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |