Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz, while Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz is around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1795 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2019 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 1794 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 45.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1080(-15.9%) | 1284(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2011(-19.1%) | 2484(0.0%) |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz | 2,011 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 2,484 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 45.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz | 1,080 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 1,284 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 @ 2.40GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |