Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz is newer than Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz also around 6% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6236 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | ×Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$299.99 - BUY
![]() |
$259.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.2 GHz | Up to 5.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 65W | 125W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $22.81 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 574 | 5662 | |
CPU Value | 66.1 | 71.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3030(-0.6%) | 3046(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 19829(0.0%) | 18693(-5.7%) |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 19,829 | |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 18,693 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 66.1 | |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 71.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 3,030 | |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 3,046 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 125W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |