Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz also around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F32 uses around 36% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 15 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7F32 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$199.95 - BUY
![]() |
$152.03 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 19MB | |
TDP | 180W | 125W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $32.85 | $22.81 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q1 2018 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 8 | |
CPU Value | 115.7 | 130.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2347(0.0%) | 2143(-8.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 23142(0.0%) | 19811(-14.4%) |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 19,811 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 130.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 2,143 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 180W | 125W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |