Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz is newer than Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz, while Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz is around 32% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 41% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 567 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1440 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | Up to 2.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 10W | 25W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.83 | $4.56 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q4 2023 | |
# of Samples | 564 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 13.5 | 12.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1505(0.0%) | 892(-40.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4038(0.0%) | 2745(-32.0%) |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 4,038 | |
Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz | 2,745 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 13.5 | |
Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz | 12.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 1,505 | |
Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz | 892 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | Intel Core i3-9100HL @ 1.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 10W | 25W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |