Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 75F3, while AMD EPYC 75F3 is around 21% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 75F3 uses around 11% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD EPYC 75F3 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$3944.45 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 250W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $45.63 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 12.7 | 17.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2382(-14.2%) | 2775(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 54416(-20.6%) | 68505(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz | 54,416 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 68,505 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz | 12.7 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 17.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz | 2,382 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 2,775 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 @ 2.60GHz | AMD EPYC 75F3 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 250W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |