Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 73F3 also around 5% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but AMD EPYC 73F3 is around 21% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 73F3 uses around 16% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 24 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 73F3 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$2343.1 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 48MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 205W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2022 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 20 | |
CPU Value | 17.5 | 19.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2268(-21.3%) | 2883(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 48648(0.0%) | 46103(-5.2%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 48,648 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 46,103 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 17.5 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 19.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 2,268 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 2,883 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 73F3 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |