Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz is newer than AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core, while AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 20% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 493 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz | ×AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | AM2+ | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 16.0MB, | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 487 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 71.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 690(-20.0%) | 862(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1378(-16.8%) | 1656(0.0%) |
ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz | 1,378 | |
AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core | 1,656 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz | NA | |
AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core | 71.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz | 690 | |
AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core | 862 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN [email protected]+GHz | AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |