Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz, while Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz is around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2106 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$79.1 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 2105 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 24.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 784(-26.1%) | 1061(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1597(-16.0%) | 1901(0.0%) |
ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz | 1,597 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz | 1,901 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz | NA | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz | 24.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz | 784 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz | 1,061 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |