Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 687 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | ×Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$365 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | FCLGA1851 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.6 GHz | Up to 5.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 24) | 20 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 2,432KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 30MB | |
TDP | 65W | 125W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $22.81 | |
Other | Intel Graphics | Intel Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q4 2024 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 683 | |
CPU Value | 98.0 | 160.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4909(0.0%) | 4845(-1.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 53821(-8.4%) | 58730(0.0%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 53,821 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 58,730 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 98.0 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 160.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 4,909 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 4,845 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 125W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |