Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is around 22% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H uses around 47% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 21 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | ×Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA2049 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.4 GHz | Up to 5.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 16) | 16 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 1,632KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 24MB | L1: 1,632KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 24MB | |
TDP | 45W | 28W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $5.11 | |
Other | Intel Arc 140T GPU | Intel Arc 140T GPU, Intel AI Boost | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 8 | |
CPU Value | 53.6 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4410(-1.7%) | 4486(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34896(0.0%) | 27050(-22.5%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 34,896 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | 27,050 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 53.6 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 4,410 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | 4,486 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | 28W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |