Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is around 25% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | ×Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | FCLGA1851 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.4 GHz | Up to 5.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 24) | 24 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 2,688KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 2,432KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel Graphics, Intel AI Boost | Intel Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 4 | |
CPU Value | 73.3 | 98.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4873(-0.7%) | 4909(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 40238(-25.2%) | 53821(0.0%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 40,238 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 53,821 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 73.3 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 98.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | 4,873 | |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | 4,909 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |